Your Questions Answered

At our third Town Hall, we invited attendees to share their questions on sticky notes — and wow, did you deliver! From funding and priorities to who makes decisions and how. Your questions reflected the care, curiosity, and thoughtfulness that make this community so special.

After the meeting, we sat down as a committee to read every single note and thoughtfully answer each one and published them here. We’re grateful for the opportunity to clarify, connect, and continue this important conversation about the future of recreation on Lopez.

Q: What happens if the 37c ballot measure only does NOT pass?

If the levy doesn’t pass but the resolution to form the District does pass, then we’ll have an unfunded Lopez Rec. After-school and summer programs will cease to exist when LIFRC’s grant expires in 2027. Without funding for school sports, the school district will be forced to make additional cuts or scramble for deeper donations, year after year, with no stability or support in sight. The time really is now to pass this ballot measure.

Q: How will the commission seek public input?
Will there be public comment?

Public input will be central to how Lopez Rec will operate – after all, this is By Lopez, For Lopez. The commissioners will be responsive to the community’s needs and priorities, and public entities always work best when public input is at the heart of decision-making. Open meetings are required by law, ensuring transparency, but there are other opportunities to provide input as well.

For example:

  • Public comment at commission meetings, where your questions, concerns, and ideas will be heard and considered.
  • Advisory committees, which allow residents to work closely with the commission on programs, planning, and policies.
  • Surveys, workshops, and special forums, designed to gather feedback on specific initiatives or community needs.

The goal is to make sure that Lopez Rec reflects the voices of our community. Your participation will shape how programs are developed, how resources are allocated, and how the district grows to serve everyone on the island.

If passed, we strongly encourage everyone to get involved – attend meetings, share your ideas, and help build a Parks and Recreation District that truly meets the needs of Lopez Island. This is your future district, and your input will help guide its success.

Q: Since the real problem is the school budget, could Parks and Rec focus only on the school rather than other programs?

There are several real problems Lopez Rec will address, including the expiring grant that supports after-school and summer programming, access to sustainable activities for all Lopezians, and the school’s budget shortfall. Through an interlocal cooperation agreement (the legal term for different government entities working together), Lopez Rec will fully fund school sports at $180,000, which frees up those funds to be spent on core education. Lopez Rec is the only sustainable (over many years) and significant (big dollar amount) solution currently available to the district. We don’t currently see other ways to address the school’s budget shortfall, but there are other ways Lopez Rec can have a collaborative and beneficial relationship with the school, including school based activities for youth – if approved by commissioners in collaboration with community input.

Q: Could this levy help fund a daycare or similar service?

Daycare is a word generally associated with toddlers through preschool ages. These services are currently provided through our Children’s Center (who have endorsed Lopez Rec!). They’ve got this covered for our community – we’re thankful for their great work. 

After-school and summer programs, also called out-of-school programs, are for K-5 aged children and Lopez Rec absolutely intends to provide this programming – it’s one of the three main funding priorities of Lopez Rec. 

In our committee’s initial outreach to local organizations, we met with LIFRC and they informed us that the grant that currently funds these programs is set to expire and they asked that we include this programming in our vision for Lopez Rec. This long-term planning means that this programming can continue without a pause and our working families won’t be left scrambling. 

A note on efficiencies: the LIFRC currently uses a $330,000 grant to fund after-school and summer programs. Anticipating that a Rec Director would substantially staff the administration of the programs, we reduced the anticipated levy expenditure to $200,000.

Q: You mention having projects for seniors. Doesn’t our Senior Center already do that? Won’t you duplicate their work?

Our Senior Center already does a great job providing weekly senior meals at Woodmen Hall, home delivery of meals, hospice support and referrals, and driving assistance for off-island appointments. They’re a great asset for our community and Lopez Rec would be excited to partner! Lopez Rec won’t duplicate or supplant – but can offer new programming and financial efficiencies through partnership. Park and Recreation Districts commonly support senior centers, offer senior programming, and senior discounts on activities. There are lots of opportunities ahead to develop programming that serves the interests of our seniors (most of whom don’t seem to identify as “seniors”).

Q: Will the commissioners influence which sports are included and how budgets per sport are set?

The Rally for the Rec vision is to fully fund school sports, including all current varsity, JV and middle school sports. Island Rec does this on San Juan with a Memorandum of Understanding between San Juan Island School District and Island Rec that is negotiated by Park Commissioners. Commissioners make final decisions about budgeting and have general oversight.

Non-school related recreational sports (or activities) will be responsive to community interest and feedback, but will ultimately be overseen and implemented by the director and commissioners.

Commissioners are responsible for managing the budget and creating policies and procedures and the director will be responsible for implementing programs. The likely plan is that commissioners will develop an application process for instructors applying to offer programming. As an example, if a community member wants to lead a watercolor art class, they’ll start by filling out an application developed by the commissioners. The approval of the application will follow commissioner guidelines (for example, anti-discrimination policies, accessible facilities, etc.) and be evaluated by the director to gauge community interest, feasibility, and facility availability. 

Also, commissioners, along with the director, will help facilitate agreements between cooperating organizations offering programming. For example, the Pack and LIFRC currently offer youth soccer. If those organizations wanted to hand off the programming to Lopez Rec (and maybe they don’t – the idea is to support, never supplant), the director and commissioners will all collaborate with the organizations to set up the program. 

Q: Your projected budget shows only 50% of tax dollars going to programs, with the rest as overhead. That seems inefficient.

We’ve never identified 50% going to overhead! There’s lots of ways to talk about budgets and it’s also important to remember that only elected commissioners can develop an actual budget. Our committee considered lots of factors when we landed on the 37 cent levy rate. We wanted to directly fund school sports and anticipated a $180,000 expenditure of levy revenue. Funding after-school and summer programming will support our working families, so we allocated for that as well. LIFRC currently funds the programming with a $330,000 grant, but we thought we could reduce that by having our director implement and support the programming, so our committee reduced the anticipated allocation to $200,000.

In our years-long communication with our community and with dozens of Park and Recs across the region, we learned about anticipated operational expenses. Park and Rec departments are often part of a city or county government and access legal, accounting, insurance and other supports through the local government. Lopez does not have a local government to provide that infrastructure, so we must include that in our budgeting. 

Please visit the levy page on our website for more details on how we got to the 37 cents. And remember:the elected commissioners will develop and create the actual operational budget. 

The County resolution that placed this initiative on the November ballot clearly directs Lopez Rec to fund school sports, after-school and summer programs, and set aside 10% of levy revenue for capital improvements ( to caretake our shared physical resources).

There’s a lot of work ahead for the future commissioners to implement the full vision of Lopez Rec – a lot of learning, listening, adapting, growing, and responding to create something that is an actual budget. 

As a recap on the democratic process: our committee formed to generate a solution to a problem and then engaged in research and community outreach; our committee created the petition and gathered signatures to put Lopez Rec on the ballot; our committee engages with our community to inform and support voter choice; voters choose to form the district, fund the district with the levy, and elect commissioners; elected commissioners govern the District.

Q: Please be more specific about the “other activities” beyond school sports and after-school care, and explain why they’re included.

The vision for recreational activities for all Lopezians includes three approaches: 

  1. Bringing back beloved programs that have disappeared due to lack of volunteers, like community little league baseball, sailing club and the Christmas Ship. 
  2. Support local instructors who want to lead classes or are already leading classes on their own or by providing them with insurance, registration software, accessible and appropriate facilities, training and accounting support. 
  3. Partner with existing organizations to sustain and expand current programming, like island bike rides to historic places with a Lopez Historical Society docent or art classes in partnership with the Library or providing elementary sports with The Pack as a pipeline to varsity sports.

Once Lopez Rec infrastructure is set up and running, additional recreational programming can be provided efficiently and can preserve, sustain and expand offerings for all Lopezians. By utilizing the support of the structure of Lopez Rec, the costs of these programs are minimal as they are primarily funded through participation fees, as modeled by Park and Recreation Districts across the state.

These four questions had the same answer:

Q: Will Rec have one insurance policy that other Lopez nonprofits can buy into? Q: How was the insurance issue “cracked,” and how will it work? Q: Can you explain the insurance arrangement in more detail? Q: Rec will have one insurance policy that the other Lopez non-profits will buy into?

As a Parks and Recreation District, Lopez Rec can obtain insurance that covers all of its programs and activities. This means that if other organizations or instructors partner with Lopez Rec, their activities could also be included under the district’s insurance. Parks and Rec districts partner with organizations and individual instructors in many ways, so there are options for accessing insurance, registration software, facilities, training, and more.

For example, the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA), through partnerships with insurance providers, offers programs tailored to parks and recreation organizations. These programs include umbrella liability coverage, allowing multiple entities to be insured under a single policy. This approach simplifies insurance management and provides comprehensive coverage for a variety of recreational activities.

There are also other models and options available, and it will be the responsibility of the commissioners to explore which approach is most appropriate for Lopez Rec. And if you’re wondering whether or not insurance is necessary – Yes! Insurance protects staff, participants, and the financial resources our community is investing in. Good intentions don’t prevent lawsuits; courts adjudicate based upon law, not the honor system.

Q. Your slide said 14 c out of 37 goes to support school. 14/37 = 38% and works out to $312K. That’s awesome! Please reconcile with the $180K mentioned several times for school athletics.

For simplicity, and as modeled by Island Rec on San Juan, we identified the expected expenditures our three priorities would cost and then included in each a weighted percentage of the indirect costs to safely operate a Park and Rec District. This is how organizations that fund multiple programs share the cost of running the organization. See our levy page for more details. 

Q: Will woodshop be reinstated if the levy is approved?

Wood shop class at the school is not running this year because the school does not have the budget for the teacher salary. There are real challenges (legal and union-based) for a Park and Rec to directly pay a teacher’s salary. The Lopez Rec monies that go to school athletics will free up the general school operating budget which is what schools use to pay salaries so it is possible that next year, the school budget with the Lopez Rec money included would support woodshop class. Lopez Rec could offer classes in the wood shop at the school for adults, youth and families in the same way that they might use the gym or the culinary classroom if the community shows interest!

Q: Can we allocate more funding to the school?

Lopez Rec can definitely support additional youth programming on Lopez, but the Rally for the Rec committee can see no programs besides the school athletic program that are currently funded by the school budget that could be funded by Lopez Rec and relieve the school budget challenges. Having said that, in terms of extra enrichment activities, field trips and special programs that are outside of the school budget, it would make sense for Lopez Rec to consider how, in partnership with the school, it could support such opportunities.

Q: Can you bring back the 53 students who left? That would solve the school’s budget deficit.

Many of those students were attending remotely during the pandemic and may or may not have remained on Lopez. We also graduated 25 seniors last year and have only 16 kindergarteners, so some of the enrollment drop is due to that. Several students entered the district this year from home-schooling and from other local schools, which is a start. Ensuring we have school sports with Lopez Rec and providing a year-round array of recreational activities for youth will definitely help retain and recruit students as well!

Q: Will you support the school bus system for sports at a countywide pay rate?

Yes, the vision is to use LISD transportation staff at their pay rate for any use of the buses. LISD will continue to run the school sports program, pay their coaches, utilize school facilities, and pay their transportation staff; Lopez Rec will reimburse LISD according to a Memorandum of Understanding – same sports we know and love, different funding source.

Q: Totally supportive of school sports and after-school programming, but is all the “other” support really needed?

Thank you for your support! Our vision includes island-wide programming for all Lopezians. The local organizations that have endorsed us are also excited about the efficiencies provided to them through the support for all-ages recreational programming. Once the infrastructure of Lopez Rec is in place, organizations and individuals will be able to offer a wide variety of programming in partnership with Lopez Rec.

Q: What about funding for afterschool clubs?

This is definitely a possibility! Current clubs fall under the Associated Student Body (ASB) and there are regulations around those. Other clubs could be formed and administered by Lopez Rec if there is interest from students and the commissioners agree to provide for them. 

Q: Why aren’t you showing the proposed budget that led you to 37 c?

As a formation committee, we are not responsible for final budget decisions. That responsibility belongs to the future Parks & Recreation District commissioners (once the district is formed.) However, we conducted two years of research to arrive at the budget vision that we have shared with fixed amounts identified to preserve school sports and after-school and summer programming, estimated amounts for insurance, registration software, staffing, accounting, etc that are necessary to run the district legally, safely and accountably and provide recreational activities for all Lopezians. 

Once the district is approved, the elected commissioners will hold public meetings to set and adopt a formal budget, ensuring full transparency and community input every step of the way.

In response to this question we have since added a page on our website dedicated to the levy and the factors that went into proposing the levy rate. There are also a number of useful articles in the Rally Rundown page on our website on topics related to this question, including things like “Why Do We Need a Director.”

Q: Are the salaries in stone or do the commissioners have some authority over that budget?

The commissioners are responsible for all funding decisions, including staffing. Our committee researched the salaries of Parks and Rec Departments both regionally and across the state in order to make sure elected commissioners have sufficient resources to run the District. The Washington State average salary for a P&R Director is $117,000, but local salary comparables are equally as important. Commissioners will determine actual salary and staffing decisions – all in open public meetings and in response to community input. 

Q: If all is approved, who (or what agency) will be in charge of the budget?

The elected commissioners of Lopez Rec would be responsible for the budget.

Q: Are the salaries fixed, or do commissioners have authority to adjust them?

The salaries shown in our examples are estimates, based on current market rates and what it would likely take to retain qualified local staff to coordinate island-wide recreation programs. These figures were used to help model a realistic and responsible levy rate, not to lock in specific salaries. Once the Parks & Recreation District is formed, the elected commissioners will have full authority to review, adjust, and approve all salaries as part of the formal budgeting process — in public meetings that invite community input.

Q: Please show a slide of your working budget.

We don’t have this slide to show because it’s up to the elected commissioners to develop an actual budget – but we do have a levy page that takes a more detailed look at the decision making behind the levy rate. 

Q: Explain in detail how you arrived at the total amount requested. What is the money specifically targeted for?

Please see our levy page!

Q: On the slide with coin images showing where money goes, why wasn’t operations cost shown?

The operations costs weren’t shown separately on the slide because the slide was illustrating how Parks & Rec allocates its funding across program areas, rather than showing the full operational budget.

For simplicity, and as modeled by Island Rec on San Juan, we identified the expected expenditures our three priorities would cost and then included in each a weighted percentage of what it costs to run a Park and Rec District. This is how organizations that fund multiple programs share the cost of running the organization. See our levy page for more details. 

Q: How will private entrepreneurs, the pool, and school programs receiving funds be cost-controlled?

The newly elected commissioners will be responsible for making sure all district funds are managed responsibly and transparently. Once in place, the board will set policies for how money is allocated and monitored. They’ll set up policies and procedures (sorry for the boring words, but that’s what commissioners do!) for how locals looking to provide programming will be evaluated and paid (often set up as a standard application and with set ratios for revenue sharing). Commissioners will also establish interlocal cooperation agreements (again, just a legal term for government agencies working together to create efficiencies of public resources) with the school. Every financial decision will happen in public meetings and be part of the public record, following open meeting laws and state accountability standards. 

In short, cost control comes through public oversight (your voices matter!), transparent decision-making (attend the open public meetings!), and clear board policies that set the system up for success – all of which are built into how the district is legally required to operate.

Q: Will the noncontested candidates be at the candidate forum?

Yes, we were all there. The candidate forum was hosted by the League of Women Voters, so only contested candidates were invited to speak. 

Q: Why was the candidate slide only shown briefly, with some names missing?

The candidate slide was only shown briefly because the town hall was not intended to be a candidate forum. The slide included the Rally for the Rec committee’s preferred candidates:

  • Commissioner #1: Lynn Slaughter
  • Commissioner #2: Brady Smith
  • Commissioner #3: Jenny Poole
  • Commissioner #4: Bridie Spreine
  • Commissioner #5: Kit Ledbetter

 

It was never meant to be a comprehensive list of all candidates. The committee encourages the community to learn about all candidates and consider their perspectives as the district moves forward, particularly since one candidate has already publicly stated they do not support the district and will be voting no!

Q: Is anyone from the Rally for the Rec Committee planning to apply for the Director position?

All applicants must be considered as per labor law, but no RFR committee member has expressed interest in a Director position.

Q: Can a Board Member also apply for the Director position?

Theoretically yes, but they would have to resign as a Commissioner.

Q: Is the property tax relief for seniors and low-income households different than what is already available? Currently it is deferred payment, the state puts a lien on your property and there is interest

The property tax relief we mentioned is what is already available through San Juan County

Q: Is anyone exempt from the levy? Seniors? Financially challenged others?

Yes, qualifying seniors and people with disabilities are eligible for exemptions from all regular property tax levies, including a Parks & Recreation District levy. Here’s how it works, based on Washington State law and San Juan County Assessor guidelines:

  1. The Senior Citizens & People with Disabilities Property Tax Exemption Program applies to most local levies, such as those for schools, fire districts, and proposed parks & rec districts.
  2. If someone qualifies (meeting the age, disability, ownership, residency, and income requirements), their property tax bill is reduced proportionally, including the amount that would otherwise go to a Parks & Rec District.
  3. The exemption amount depends on income, property value, and total local levy rates, but it can fully or partially remove the district’s levy from their tax responsibility.

Q: The tax presentation was confusing. Are you limited to collecting the $800,000 for the duration of the levy, or can collections increase as property values rise?

If voters approve the 37 cent levy rate, that rate will be applied to 2026 assessed property values to calculate the maximum levy revenue that can be collected by Lopez Rec. By law, that levy revenue can only increase by 1% annually (which is why levy rates go down when assessed values increase). 

The District can collect less levy revenue than is first established  – this is called banking capacity (the legal term for collecting less levy revenue than what is approved by voters) and is a tool available to all taxing districts. It can’t, however, collect more than the 1% increase allowed by law. 

Q: The tax presentation was confusing. Are you limited to collecting the $800,000 for the duration of the levy, or can collections increase as property values rise?

The first two primary partnerships that are central to the vision of Lopez Rec are with the Lopez Island School District and the Lopez Island Family Resource Center. LISD will receive funding for school sports and will make their facilities available for Lopez Rec use when not in use by students. LISD has also expressed interest in providing office space for Lopez Rec, access to school facilities such as the culinary room, the art room which has pottery wheels and kiln, and the wood shop for community classes as well as regular classrooms for adult ed evening classes in English, Spanish, technology, etc.. Lopez Rec will partner with the LIFRC to provide after-school and summer programming which is currently funded by the federal 21st Century Learning Grant that expires in 2027. 

Lopez Rec also envisions partnering with The Pack to fund and ensure middle school, club and community sports that are currently funded and insured by The Pack. The Lopez Island Historical Society and Museum has expressed an interest in partnering to provide historic tours (walking, bicycle, kayak). Many other organizations, including those that have endorsed Lopez Rec such as Lopez Fit, LIPTSA, Lopez Children’s Center, have offered ideas for partnership that we hope to pursue.

Individuals who want to offer activities can partner with Lopez Rec to access insurance, registration software and a digital brochure, training and access to facilities. Again, the commissioners will set up a standard application process for locals looking to offer programming and set up agreements for disbursement of participation fees (often 80% to program leaders and 20% to the Rec District to cover costs). 

Local businesses can also offer classes through Lopez Rec and will benefit from Lopez Rec tax dollars staying on Lopez. 

Q: Will levy funds be used to maintain facilities such as the golf course, tennis courts, or community pool?

The golf course and the pool are private facilities with private funding for maintenance. The tennis courts are school property that are maintained by LICTA at no cost to the school under an agreement. Please refer to the Statement from FLIP on our website. We’ve also written a Rally Rundown that answers someone’s question regarding whether we intend to buy real estate, and it also discusses upkeep of shared community resources – which again are not private facilities!

Q: Will levy funds be used to maintain facilities such as the golf course, tennis courts, or community pool?

The golf course and the pool are private facilities with private funding for maintenance. The tennis courts are school property that are maintained by LICTA at no cost to the school under an agreement. Please refer to the Statement from FLIP on our website. We’ve also written a Rally Rundown that answers someone’s question regarding whether we intend to buy real estate, and it also discusses upkeep of shared community resources – which again are not private facilities!

Q: What about renters? They benefit, but how do they contribute?

Island residents who do not pay property taxes contribute indirectly through their rent as landlords typically include property tax costs in their monthly rent. They also contribute through any participation fees which are determined by the commissioners.

Q: Are you collaborating with existing recreation entities (Land Bank, YCC, County Park, BLM) for programming?

Of the organizations mentioned, the Rally for the Rec committee has been in touch with YCC regarding programming and we hope and expect YCC to seek Lopez Rec funding and look for opportunities for collaboration. No formal agreements are in place with the Land Bank, San Juan County Parks or BLM at this time but as a committee we think partnering with them to provide programming on Lopez Island is a great idea!

Q: Will levy funds support religious groups like 3Vs?

Public dollars must be allocated following Washington State RCWs, including legally defined separations of church and state.

Q: What is the current library levy per $1000?

Check out the library’s website for that information – $0.48 per thousand. 

Still Have Questions?

Click on the button below to submit your questions and we will do our very best to answer them in a timely manner.

Rally for the Rec Logo - Variant Colour-PNG

A community campaign to bring a Parks and Rec District to Lopez Island.

Contact Us

Rally for the Rec © 2024 Lopez Island Parks and Rec District Formation Committee | Website and Branding by Stephanie Cariker